IMO, the less native platform scripts we have the better. I'm defs against adding new ones... and really interested in removing the ones we currently have.

If only Microsoft would ship a /bin/sh then I'd be happy to keep around a single set of scripts... but ya, thats not gonna happen :-(

--jason


On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Donald Woods wrote:



Jeff Genender wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
Is this a scenario that would be better handled by the gshell code in
sandbox or some daemon code that also handles the multiple server
instance support?
Thought here, would be gshell could read a standard Java properties file
for JVM args and then launch the server with them.....

As long as one JVM launches, the other (ie. gshell or groovy can start another instance of a JVM) then this is doable. Otherwise, this won't
work...with my Terracotta example being a reason.
In my eyes, scripts are a no-go, unless you can make them platform
neutral and not require users to install a third-party solution like
Perl (on Windows) to make it work.
We already ship sh and bat code...why would this be a no-go? If this is
the case, then we shouldn't be shipping startup scripts in bat and sh
format.

I know Jason would be in favor of dropping the complicated .sh/.bat files we have now, as we have seen several breakages between them this release (between the openjpa agent, handling spaces in paths on Windows, file separators, ...)

My point, was that having to provide 2 scripts per extension (Unix and Windows) would be troublesome for some, like all you Mac users who hate Windows :-)

-Donald

-Donald


Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi,

As we move forward and we integrate with more and more 3rd party
products, we will need the ability to be able to change an environment
variable through a plugin, or add a commandline JAVA_OPTS, etc.

Currently our startup scripts call the setjavaenv.sh to set environment
properties.  It would really be nice to have the ability to have a
"scripts" directory, where all of the scripts get executed before
Geronimo is launched.  Why do we want this?

As we grow in our plugins, they will need to set environment or java options set before running G. They may also have a need to start or run
other outside processes  that are not a part of G.

It would be great to allow plugins to install an rc script that gets
executed to do activities before and perhaps after G is run?

I would propose we create a scripts directory under bin or under var that could be similar to init.d, and have it called with start/ stop, etc. This way plugins can install specific scripts in these directories
for execution.

Thoughts?

Jeff



Reply via email to