Hey Donald (and others) ... Is anybody actually using this framework
"ie. containerless" assembly? I was just thinking of removing this
assembly prior to seeing this change.
At one point in time this was going to be our most minimal assembly
(without even a web container) for building up a pluggable server.
However, it seems like the tide is changing to always expect a web
container in the smallest framework assembly (ie. the minimal assemblies
we already have). There's been a lot of cool work on the pluggable
console and it seems like are heading in a direction to make this the
primary interface for building and managing the server ... but of course
it requires a web container as a minimal starting point.
So, the question is: Should we remove the framework assembly and work
on the assumption that our most minimal assemblies should always include
a web container?
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dwoods
Date: Wed Aug 22 07:47:42 2007
New Revision: 568632
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568632&view=rev
Log:
adding missing depend on geronimo-boilerplate-minimal
Modified:
geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml
Modified: geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml?rev=568632&r1=568631&r2=568632&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml (original)
+++ geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml Wed Aug 22
07:47:42 2007
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@
<dependencies>
<dependency>
+ <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.assemblies</groupId>
+ <artifactId>geronimo-boilerplate-minimal</artifactId>
+ <version>${version}</version>
+ </dependency>
+
+ <dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.configs</groupId>
<artifactId>j2ee-system</artifactId>
<version>${version}</version>
