Vasily,

We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/


On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

Hi,

Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/

When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128>  is
related to this issue, and it's still open.

At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926

Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current
situation with this issue?

Thank you very much!

Vasily Zakharov
Intel ESSD


---
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
Chapayevsky Per, 14.

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


Reply via email to