Maybe we need to start using a running branch for 2.0.x, like we do on the server and have trunk for new features (like supporting 2.0 deployment plans). That way, we can merge work from trunk into the 2.0 branch when its ready...
-Donald Tim McConnell wrote:
So as not to get to far out of sync with the server I feel we should shoot for a release date of 4 weeks after the 2.0.2 release of Geronimo. Does anyone have other/better thoughts ??Tim McConnell wrote:Hi, I would like to starting discussing what we think should be included in the 2.0.1 release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin. I have some very preliminary thoughts that I have listed below but would like to encourage input from others. My initial thoughts are:1. High priority JIRAs 2. Inclusion of the latest WTP release candidate3. Build and test infrastructure improvements (e.g., build cleanup/improvements, execution of testcases during the build, a testsuite framework for the plugin, and a useful set of samples).4. Full support for the Geronimo 2.0 deployment plans
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
