On 10/9/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sample itself is fine, but the documentation is a bit "harsh". > Can't say what exactly, but saw a couple of places to improve the > overall reading.
Ok. Sounds good. Jarek
On 10/9/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sample itself is fine, but the documentation is a bit "harsh". > Can't say what exactly, but saw a couple of places to improve the > overall reading.
Ok. Sounds good. Jarek