On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
Hi Kevan, I've marked G3309 as resolved. I documented my analysis
in the latest few comments I added in the JIRA. If there is
anything else that is missing from a legal point of view, please
let me know.
Hi Lin,
That's great. Thanks for working on this. A few comments:
1. Artifacts that are AL2 licensed can still be mentioned in the
license file. Although not necessary, it's good for completeness.
Just say the following are licensed under ALv2: commons-logging, etc.
2. I think the NOTICE file needs a bit more attention. Even though
projects are ALv2 licensed, we need to reproduce their NOTICE
attributions as appropriate. Also, our notice file should mention
dom4j, pull-parser, and jaxen and reproduce the copyrights that are
in their licenses. The pull-parser license requires the following
acknowledgement:
"This product includes software developed by the Indiana
University Extreme! Lab. For further information please visit
http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/";
The appropriate location for this acknowledgement is the NOTICE file.
I'll look a bit more...
--kevan
