The -Dstage=former is not working as desired. I was unsuccessful in fixing it tonight. I'll try again tomorrow.
However, the new restructuring is building fine. It has passed testsuite tests too. (If it passes TCK too, I may not waste any more time trying to fix old build, esp when I am deleting it the day after). Does anybody really really want it to work ? Cheers Prasad On 10/30/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry and thanx Jarek. I have fixed the security-deployer-config > pom.xml and plan.xml. This will remove any extraneous dependencies it > has on plugin artifacts. > > Cheers > Prasad > > On 10/30/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I removed all org/apache/geronimo from my m2 repo and executed mvn > > install -Dstage=bootstrap. That failed with the error below in > > ./framework/configs/server-security-config. Looks like the > > dependencies are not setup right since it was also downloading > > j2ee-deployer/car and a bunch of other modules which have not been > > built yet. > > > > Jarek > > > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] start of > > org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-deployer/2.1-SNAPSHOT/car failed > > > > Could not find a valid constructor for GBean: > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder > > ParameterTypes: [class > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.Environment, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.Kernel] > > constructor types: [class > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.Environment, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface java.util.Collection, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface org.apache.geronimo.kernel.Kernel] > > constructor types: [class > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.Environment, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, class > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.AbstractNameQuery, interface > > java.util.Collection, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ActivationSpecInfoLocator, > > interface org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.deployment.NamespaceDrivenBuilder, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.deployment.NamespaceDrivenBuilder, interface > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilderExtension, class > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.Naming] > > > > > > On 10/30/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > GERONIMO-3565 has now checked in the new restructured trunk into svn. > > > > > > The default profile will build the new trunk pieces. > > > > > > The -Dstage=former profile will build the old trunk pieces. > > > > > > Let's closely monitor the automated builds, testsuites and TCK results. > > > > > > If everything is going smoothly, I shall remove the old trunk pieces > > > by eod, Thursday, Nov 1 2007. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Prasad > > > > > > On 10/30/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am restructuring the trunk in svn to reflect our flexible server. > > > > Instead of a move, it will be a two-step copy/delete process. I shall > > > > first begin by copying some directories to other directories. Server > > > > binaries will be built from the newly created directories. After they > > > > have gone thro' 2 days of automated builds, testsuites and TCK > > > > smoketests, I shall remove the old directories. > > > > > > > > So until further notice, please commit all your changes to both > > > > directories, old and new. > > > > > > > > Most modules and config directories have gone into their feature > > > > specific directory under plugins. For eg, changes to > > > > configs/myfaces-deployer should be made to that dir and also to > > > > plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer. > > > > > > > > A few modules and configs have been copied into framework directory > > > > (to build framework assembly). > > > > > > > > For a more detailed discussion about the restructuring, please see > > > > this thread - > > > > http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=13469170&framed=y&skin=134 > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > >
