[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GSHELL-81:
-------------------------------
Description:
It seems that GShell is currently unable to run without the sun.* packages in
the classloader.
The reason is that it uses xstream advanced mode which make use of these
packages.
If these packages are not on the classpath, xstream will default to the pure
java reflection provider which will cause exceptions like the following:
{noformat}
Caused by: com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: Cannot
construct org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not
have a no-args constructor
---- Debugging information ----
message : Cannot construct
org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not have a
no-args constructor
cause-exception :
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.ObjectAccessException
cause-message : Cannot construct
org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not have a
no-args constructor
class : org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.Layout
required-type : org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode
path : /layout/nodes/command
-------------------------------
{noformat}
I'm not sure if this is a good idea or if we should support that pure java
mode...
was:
It seems that GShell is currently unable to run without the sun.* packages in
the classloader.
The reason is that it uses xstream advanced mode which make use of these
packages.
If these packages are not on the classpath, xstream will default to the pure
java reflection provider which will cause exceptions like the following:
Caused by: com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: Cannot
construct org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not
have a no-args constructor
---- Debugging information ----
message : Cannot construct
org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not have a
no-args constructor
cause-exception :
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.ObjectAccessException
cause-message : Cannot construct
org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not have a
no-args constructor
class : org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.Layout
required-type : org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode
path : /layout/nodes/command
-------------------------------
I'm not sure if this is a good idea or if we should support that pure java
mode...
> Depdendency on sun.* packages
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: GSHELL-81
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-81
> Project: GShell
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> Assignee: Jason Dillon
> Fix For: 1.0-alpha-2
>
>
> It seems that GShell is currently unable to run without the sun.* packages in
> the classloader.
> The reason is that it uses xstream advanced mode which make use of these
> packages.
> If these packages are not on the classpath, xstream will default to the pure
> java reflection provider which will cause exceptions like the following:
> {noformat}
> Caused by: com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: Cannot
> construct org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not
> have a no-args constructor
> ---- Debugging information ----
> message : Cannot construct
> org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not have a
> no-args constructor
> cause-exception :
> com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.ObjectAccessException
> cause-message : Cannot construct
> org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode as it does not have a
> no-args constructor
> class : org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.Layout
> required-type : org.apache.geronimo.gshell.layout.model.CommandNode
> path : /layout/nodes/command
> -------------------------------
> {noformat}
> I'm not sure if this is a good idea or if we should support that pure java
> mode...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
