[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3641:
------------------------------------------
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
(was: 2.1)
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
(was: 2.1)
Looks like there is nothing to be addressed here. My bad, this should have
been an e-mail to dev-list instead of a JIRA :(
> NamedUPCredentialLoginModule vs
> ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3641
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3641
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: security
> Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
>
> I see that ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule and
> NamedUPCredentialLoginModule are added to geronimo codebase around the same
> time (rev 159325 and rev 159560). The difference between the two is that
> NamedUPCredentialLoginModule uses the user supplied username and password
> where as ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule gets the username
> and password from options supplied to the login module.
> NamedUPCredentialLoginModule is used by the Security realms portlet whereas
> there are no references to ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
> in the codebase. I guess one of them (most likely
> ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule) is redundant and it
> should be eliminated. What am I missing?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
