Thanks Gianny. More below...

On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:

On 17/01/2008, at 1:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:


On Jan 16, 2008, at 7:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: gdamour
Date: Wed Jan 16 04:48:37 2008
New Revision: 612439

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=612439&view=rev
Log:
Move farm related classes to new sub-project geronimo-farm. Add a new configuration "farming" and move farming related GBeans from the clustering config. to this new one. Also, by default this configuration is not started.

Cool. Gianny, can you give us a bit of status about where you are with this? Looks like you're laying some groundwork for OpenEJB dependencies...
Hi,

David J. proposed a while back two clustering code/module rearrangements he was keen to have implemented before 2.1. With this commit, both of these rearrangements are now in.

Right. Although I haven't looked at the specifics, I think this split is a really good one.



I am now integration testing the OpenEJB clustering support and it appears I will need to do some minor adjustments. As part of the change, four sub-projects/dependencies are added: geronimo-openejb- clustering-wadi, geronimo-openejb-clustering-builder-wadi, openejb- clustering-wadi and openejb-clustering-builder-wadi. This structure mirrors the Jetty and Tomcat ones.

I also think 2.1 is belated and should be cut as soon as possible. I will hold-on the OpenEJB commit till the creation of a 2.1 branch.

Cool. If this branch isn't for another week or two, is that going to ok for you? I think we want to avoid creating branches/2.1 and then merging a bunch of fit-and-finish fixes between the branch and trunk...

--kevan



Thanks,
Gianny


Enhanced clustering support is really great to have. Want to understand what additional dependencies this is going to require.

I think we're overdue for a 2.1 release. We have polish and a number of usability issues to work out in current trunk, prior to this. However, worried about also pushing in a bunch of new function is going to make this difficult...

--kevan


Reply via email to