[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565827#action_12565827
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3812:
----------------------------------------
There's a plugin that once worked with a prerelease geronimo 2.0.x and apacheds
1.5.x at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/plugins/directory/branches/2.0
I'm afraid I've concentrated on improving the geronimo plugin system and
improving the structure of apacheds and lost sight of the goal of releasing
something working for 2.0.2. Realistically I won't have time for working
towards that but I'll try to give advice if someone else wants to work on it.
> Geronimo 2.0.2 misses ApacheDS (LDAP) function
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3812
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3812
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: documentation, Plugins
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2
> Environment: Debian Linux, java version "1.5.0_14",
> geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0.2
> Reporter: Sakari Maaranen
>
> Geronimo documentation at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/ldap-sample-application.html talks about
> org.apache.geronimo.configs/directory in system modules, but that does not
> exist in Geronimo 2.0.2.
> There is also a reference to Geronimo plugins. However, when I go to Plugins
> in the Geronimo console and search the geronimo-2.0.2 reposityory there is
> nothing related to ApacheDS or Directory. Like if the ApacheDS function was
> completely missing.
> The ApacheDS plugin should be added to the 2.0.2 plugin repository. The
> documentation should be updated to give the steps how to install ApacheDS
> with or without the plugin. The LDAP demo is useless if ApacheDS is
> unavailable.
> I found this much earlier discussion on the topic:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg52749.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg55148.html
> Frankly, I don't think that the forward compatibility is so much an issue,
> but 2.0.2 completely lacking LDAP server. Would be better have it, even
> without forward compatibility.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
