"Need update" would be something like moved the content from prev release but not yet finished. Or worked on some brand new content but still need to update it to reflect the latest changes on the server ( think of it as if you started before Geronimo was released, then you would have a bunch of SNAPSHOTs all over the place).
If there is anything on the Need update column then there should not be a green check mark on the status column. Does this make sense? what do others think?
As for "...still needs someone who knows what the article is talking about to
update..." I would hope that the people who jumps into any of those subjects can
follow it through all the way. Otherwise this table won't help us figure out how complete
the content really is.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Warner wrote:
Hernan,
What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page? Is
that to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows
what the article is talking about to update it based on 2.1?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi All,
an interesting thing happened twice already this week. Given the
number of doc contributions that started to flow recently (THANKS TO
ALL OF YOU CONTRIBUTING) we ended up having, or just about to have,
some overlapping.
Talking with some of the folks we thought it would be a good idea to
put together some sort of table or a list with the topics and who
was working on them. So, I updated the 2.1 doc home page and added a
few more pages to help us figure out who is working on what. This
should also help bring in new contributions.
Here is the page, I already started to put some names there. Pls
chime in and update the info with the content you are working on.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation-development.html
What to others think?
Cheers!
Hernan
--
~Jason Warner
