Jason upgraded GShell to use Xstream 1.3, which has nothing to do with Devtools. Devtools should always use the same levels of depends as the server (2.1) it's targeting...

-Donald

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:07 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: mcconne
 Date: Wed Feb 27 18:07:49 2008
 New Revision: 631818
...
 Modified: 
geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
 URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF?rev=631818&r1=631817&r2=631818&view=diff
 ==============================================================================
 --- 
geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
 (original)
 +++ 
geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
 Wed Feb 27 18:07:49 2008
 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
  lib/commons-logging-1.0.4.jar,
  lib/stax-api-1.0.jar,
  lib/cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar,
 - lib/xstream-1.2.1.jar,
 + lib/xstream-1.2.2.jar,
...
 Modified: geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
 URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/pom.xml?rev=631818&r1=631817&r2=631818&view=diff
 ==============================================================================
 --- geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/pom.xml (original)
 +++ geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/pom.xml Wed Feb 27 18:07:49 2008
 @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
             <dependency>
                 <groupId>com.thoughtworks.xstream</groupId>
                 <artifactId>xstream</artifactId>
 -                <version>1.2.1</version>
 +                <version>1.2.2</version>
             </dependency>

I think that part would benefit from using maven filter concept. I
meant to give it a try, but can't build the plugin. I believe Jason
upgraded XStream to 1.3 just today, didn't he?

Jacek

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to