On Feb 28, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, any reason why we don't follow a similar dir structure as in the repo?
Good question! Perhaps because it's easier to make a single directory
with the minimum files in it and don't bother with the long-ish paths. Can't see any other reason as simplicity. On the other hand, one could

but we have

./lib/
    + boot/
    + endorsed/
    + gshell/

which it is not entirely flat.
So it would seem to me that either way we could make some changes here to either make it really flat or consistent with the repo. Just a thought, but I think it would help make the things look more clear.

Lets not mess with it without clear understanding of what stuff is there and why. Making it flat would be fairly disasterous as far as clarity and function.

Basically until you have a repository implementation available you need a classpath. The stuff that is needed to load the repository implementations or needed in the application classloader go in lib/. Lots of people have worked hard to reduce the amount of stuff needed here but without some major gshell magic we're near the minimum now.

endorsed is a java feature for the yoko specs. We could calculate the locations in the repo and supply them on the ant "command line" that gshell sets up but that would effectively remove the plausibility of starting the server without gshell. Moving the jars into lib would make all of our startup jars in endorsed which would be a really bad idea.

boot and gshell are for gshell. Jason's working hard to move as much of the contents as possible into the repo, but it's not trivial and don't rush him.

thanks
david jencks


Cheers!
Hernan

argue it's harder to maintain but since we build Geronimo with maven
we don't really bother with it as Maven takes care of it. Hope I'm not
mistaken.
I see it that you can have the bare framework with the single lib
directory. Now, the question is what part of Geronimo introduces the
repository dir? If it's something that's not needed for the
framework's work you get the picture - you don't need to worry about
repository directory as it's outside the framework. The framework uses
lib and others can do whatever they want. If it's not the case, well,
we could think of pros and cons moving them to repository then.
Jacek


Reply via email to