Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Which brings me to a question ... Why isn't genesis listed under
subprojects from our web site with some basic information about the
project? What makes something an official "sub-project"?
Because Genesis is *not* externally consumable, or rather not intended
to be consumed by projects other than Geronimo... so we don't really
want to advertise it.
Make sense? If not I can explain further.
I think Joe is hinting that we may want to be a bit more formal (more
complete) about our handling of subprojects. At present, it's completely
haphazard. I think there are subprojects which we should document to
some level (e.g. Yoko and specs). We could decide to "document" them
all. Some of this documentation may say "intended for internal use only".
Thoughts?
Right ... that's exactly it. I'd be in favor of documenting all of them.
I was also wondering if it makes sense to have all of these as
subprojects which must be maintained, voted on, and released
independently. Modularity is great but it comes with a price. If we
can combine or eliminate some of them it might make our lives easier.
Joe
