Hi,
When you are using ejb 2.1 you had to actually specify the
jndi-name/local-jndi-name in the openejb-jar.xml. I believe that that
name was used if you wanted to do a remote lookup etc. How was this
used for local lookups? Were the ejbs available in the application
specific jndi context with the local-jndi-name? I am not sure whether
this was how it was supposed to work?
Currently I believe we are actually ignoring those names and
constructing jndi names based on the same strategy we use for ejb3. Am
I right about this? If so isn't this a bug that breaks backward
compatibility? As long as we use ejb-refs there won't be any problem
currently but if you try to access from a remote client the jndi name
used will be different.
Regards
Manu
