Yes, this is intentional. SLF4J has some optimized code to deal with
"{}" strings for substitution.
--jason
On May 6, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:34 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Mon May 5 13:34:06 2008
New Revision: 653588
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653588&view=rev
Log:
Start of custom SLF4J muck for Geronimo
- log.trace("Checking if child is running: child=" +
child);
+ log.trace("Checking if child is running:
child={}", child);
Is it intentional? Will it work without the numbering like {0}? I see
it occuring everywhere in the submitted code so it seems to be the way
it works, but thought I'd ask for some pointers.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
