On Jun 9, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:


I'm canceling this vote to address the version issues.

I will do one of the following based on how things go:
- Don't specify a G version in the plugin (as is the case now) and include artifact-alias entries to resolve Geronimo dependencies ... hopefully resulting in a plugin that can be installed on any Geronimo 2.1* server (it will probably be "installable" on 2.0* servers as well but I suspect the installation would fail).
wouldn't this require knowing all possible future geronimo versions?
I think a more plausible alternative would be coming up with a "compatibility plugin" that has the aliases to convert from one g. version to another, and checking that this plugin will install on a 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT and possibly 2.2-SNAPSHOT server that already has such a compat-plugin installed. So, while I'm not sure any changes are needed in this plugin, I think it would be a good idea to make sure we do have a path to running it in later servers.


I agree that we need a general solution.

However, I thinking of a more specific solution for this plugin so better understand our alternatives since this one is fairly simple (with just one geronimo dependency).

I was thinking of doing the following:
- completely omitting the includeVersion configuration for the car- maven-plugin so that it theoretically be installed on any Geronimo version. - Adding an artifact-alias entry to the car-maven-plugin configuration so that the resultant geronimo-plugin.xml would include a mapping. I tried adding this mapping: <artifact-alias key="org.apache.geronimo.framework/j2ee-system/$ {geronimoVersion}/car">org.apache.geronimo.framework/j2ee-system// car</artifact-alias>

My hope was that this would work for 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT and 2.2-SNAPSHOT by mapping the 2.1.1 dependency of the j2ee-system car to any version that could be found in the server repo (ie. the one that is installed for that version). I knew that it would fail installation on 2.0* since the groupId for j2ee-system changed between 2.0 & 2.1. However, for some reason the entry isn't getting included in the resultant geronimo-plugin.xml. I might be barking up the wrong tree anyway. Should it be possible to do what I was trying even if it isn't optimal?

I don't know why that wouldn't get copied to the geronimo-plugin.xml ( i think it should) but it won't work -- the LHS can omit the version but it is required on the RHS. If you omit the version in the dependency though it should install on anything.

hope this helps-- have to run
david jencks



Joe



I'm also fine with the 1.0 version on it.
thanks
david jencks

--OR--
- Include the Geronimo version to limit the plugin to G 2.1.1


Joe



Joe Bohn wrote:
Hi,
As a result of some discussion on GERONIMO-2814 [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2814 ] it was suggested that we create a plugin to facilitate adding a second repository to Geronimo. This is of particular value when running multiple Geronimo server instances from a single Geronimo installation. I have created a very simple plugin for this purpose. For more information on how this might be leveraged reference http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/multiple-repositories.html
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/plugins/server-repo/
Staging site:
http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/plugins/server-repo/1.0/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Monday (6/9) at 9:00 ET.
[ ] +1  Release the server-repo plugin
[ ] +0  No opinion
[ ] -1  Don't release the server-repo plugin
Joe



Reply via email to