Guess for 2.1.3. we can improve our documentation on GEP by elaborating more on our test sute. Recently we have been using selenium and abbot for recording our test cases. It will be good if we can make the documentation on those more elaborate. I had somewhat difficulty with abbot but BJ helped me out of it. Some modifications in release.txt to remove ANT instances.
Thanks Ashish On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, done.... > > > Ted Kirby wrote: > >> Yes, Java 6 support was added in GEP 2.1.2. See news on Geronimo home >> page, and this link: >> >> http://geronimo.apache.org/2008/08/22/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-gep-v212-released.html >> . >> You properly note that GERONIMODEVTOOLS-466 was omitted from the >> release notes: >> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.2.txt >> , >> even tho all of its subtasks were properly listed. I changed the fix >> release of GERONIMODEVTOOLS-466 from 2.1.3 to 2.1.2. Tim, can you >> change the release notes? As owner, only you can do it. >> >> Thanks, >> Ted >> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Jack Cai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Tim! Keen to see GEP to support Java 6. Suppose this is >>> implemented >>> with GERONIMODEVTOOLS-466, right? >>> >>> -Jack >>> >>> 2008/8/29 Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>> Yes >>>> >>>> Donald Woods wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yep, all of the below sound good to me. >>>>> >>>>> After GEP 2.1.3, are we planning on creating a branches/2.1 for any >>>>> future GER 2.1.x updates, so trunk can become 2.2 focused? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Donald >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tim McConnell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, to coincide with the 2.1.3 Geronimo server I would like >>>>>> to >>>>>> release another version of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin. It should >>>>>> primarily >>>>>> be maintenance release so that we can provide fixes for GEP 2.1.2 with >>>>>> some >>>>>> minor functional enhancements. Here is the content so far: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. JIRA fixes >>>>>> 2. Small incremental enhancements, such as: >>>>>> a. Deployment plan editor enhancements >>>>>> b. Better support in GEP for Ganymede p2 ?? Please provide any >>>>>> thoughts, comments, suggestions, and/or objections you might have for >>>>>> this >>>>>> plan. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tim McConnell >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- > Thanks, > Tim McConnell >
