On Sep 10, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
In-line below.
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I looked at the new plugin groups stuff and have a couple ideas/
suggestions.
I'm going to create a framework plugin group. Is there some reason
this won't work?
Are you updating the current pluginprofiles to use the framework
profile?
no and I'm undecided on whether I think its a good idea or whether a
e.g. mini-jetty server with a console would have framework and web-
jetty.
I'd like to see the plugin groups distributed closer to where their
components are found, e.g. web-jetty in plugins/jetty. Does this
seem reasonable?
Sounds okay, but I'd like to see some indication in the directory to
denote it's a profile package instead of a real CAR with code in it.
like *-group? e.g. framework-group?
I think the car-maven-plugin can use another packaging style for
these plugin groups that will mean we don't have to configure much
of anything for the c-m-p. Maybe we won't need the empty plan
either.
I thought the idea was to use only the plugin groups when
assembling our actual servers. Is this work still in progress? It
looks to me as if we have both a complete list of plugins plus the
plugin groups that would also pull them in.
Are there any jiras for this work?
Looks like Lin was using GERONIMO-4265 for most of this work and she
is out on vacation for the next week.
ok thanks!
david jencks
thanks
david jencks
