Joe, thanks for the pointers. I simply missed these discussions while I was out in early Sept. I agree that this should not stop releasing the 2.1.2 samples.
Lin On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lin, > > There have been several discussions on this topic. > > Here's the original thread: > http://tinyurl.com/3e9tao > > Here's the most recent discussion: > http://www.nabble.com/Samples---Why-are-the-tomcat-jetty-prerequisites-not-set--tt19435555s134.html#a19435555 > > You can also find the decision documented in the samples 2.1.2 status page > under "Should Jetty samples pre-req Jetty and Tomcat samples pre-req > Tomcat?" > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-samples-212-release-work-items.html > > I personally agree that it would be best to have the samples only enabled > for the proper server but this is really hitting on a larger plugin issue > and if they should be installable on a framework or only within a > tomcat/jetty assembly. > > Joe > > > > Please reference this most recent thread which includes pointers to > > Lin Sun wrote: >> >> I've tried plugin install via console. Tried bank and >> jaxws-calculator and worked well. I noticed one issue: >> >> Installable property is not marked correctly mostly, for example we >> mark jetty app plugin as installable on tomcat assembly. I think >> only one or two is marked correctly initially. >> >> Lin >> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> This a thread to discuss any issues as a result of the Geronimo Samples >>> 2.1.2 vote candidate. >>> >>> Joe >>> >> > >
