Hi Dan, thanks for reviewing them. I basically went through the overview slides very rapidly to start into the demos right away. Then after each demo we reviewed which components of the overall Java EE 5 platform architecture were used/exercised. That's why the overview diagram is repeated after each demo. I thought both demos classes went very well, and based on the cursory feedback from the attendees, it seems to be a much better approach then doing slides alone. Also, I had so many demos ready for Part 2 that the attendees were able to pick and choose those they were most interested in seeing......

Dan Becker wrote:
Hey Tim,

I just wanted to say I downloaded and read your slides, and I found them to be very informative and helpful. Especially the demos.

Your two presentations are 35 and 26 slides. Are you skipping over many of the slides in the live demos?

Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, I'm at EclipseWorld 2008 this week. On Wednesday morning I'll be leading two sessions about using Geronimo and the GEP to develop Java EE 5 applications. In response to some of the feedback I received last year, I've decided to make these sessions more interactive (and hopefully more interesting) by using only a very few presentation slides, and instead will be executing many of the GEP/Geronimo tutorials we've accumulated and documented in the past year or so. My goal is to spark more questions and interest since they'll see many of the capabilities of the GEP and Geronimo live in action and they'll be encouraged to execute the demos along with me if they wish. So, if you'd like to review what slides and demos I'll be using they can be found below. As always review comments are welcome and appreciated. Thanks.

-----> http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/EclipseWorld2008_Materials/Using%20the%20Geronimo%20Eclipse%20Plug-in%20to%20Develop%20Java%20EE%20Applications%20(Part%201).pdf

-----> http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/EclipseWorld2008_Materials/Using%20the%20Geronimo%20Eclipse%20Plug-in%20to%20Develop%20Java%20EE%20Applications%20(Part%202).pdf




--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell

Reply via email to