On Wednesday 05 November 2008 9:43:28 pm Donald Woods wrote: > These are clean room implementations, right?
Right. There were some bugs in a couple of the earlier versions where Guillaume didn't read the spec carefully enough. As a couple of people have used it, we've kind of ironed them out, but a full TCK run would be great and would be a huge confidence builder. At the very least, run the API tests. > Also, does this provide the API and IMPL for JAXB? Just the API jar. You would still need the jaxb-impl from sun. Dan > > -Donald > > Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've copied the jaxb 2.0 and 2.1 api to: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxb_2.0_s > >pec/ > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_s > >pec/ Everything looks ok (legal stuff, osgi manifest, etc...). > > Would it be possible to use them to run a tck test and see if they are > > ready to be released ? > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1) > >> because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi. > >> We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be > >> more consistent and would allow them to pass the TCK. > >> The code base are available at: > >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jaxb-api-2. > >>0/ > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jaxb-api-2. > >>1/ > >> > >> I'm quite confident that passing the TCK should not be a major problem > >> because they check the compliance with the Sun jars using a maven > >> plugin that use introspection to detect signature changes between two > >> jars. Anyway, feedback welcome. > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Guillaume Nodet > >> ------------------------ > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >> ------------------------ > >> Open Source SOA > >> http://fusesource.com -- Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dankulp.com/blog
