Gianny, I think you are correct. The most recent snapshot of OpenEJB still exhibits the same errors that were mentioned previously.
Thanks, On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Gianny Damour < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The feature is still available. However we do not provide a XML > configuration style for it. We only provide a script configuration style. > For instance, by dropping a file named: > > DependenciesPrivateClass.groovy > > in the folder of the plugin to update and with a content looking like > > Set privateClasses = ['hide.this', 'hide.that'] > > configurationData.environment.classLoadingRules.privateRule.addClassPrefixes(privateClasses) > > You can achieve the same effect. > > Let me know if you think that we should also provide a XML configuration > style. > > Regarding the TCK problem, I do not think that this change is related. I > believe that the TCK problem is due to the new OpenEJB snapshot. Jason, > could you please confirm? > > Thanks, > Gianny > > > On 14/11/2008, at 5:19 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > I think I was one of the people asking for this to be reverted. >> >> Just to clarify my position: I'm very much in favor of keeping the >> functionality. I think it will help with some of the more obscure >> classloader issues we've been hitting. >> >> My suggestion to revert the change was more pragmatic to resolve two >> issues: >> 1) new TCK failures reported by Jason >> 2) The implicit dependency on a new OpenEJB 3.1.x release >> >> If we can resolve these 2 issues without reverting the change (or for #2 >> if it seems we need a new OpenEJB 3.1.x release for other reasons ... like >> other TCK failures) then I'm very much in favor of keeping this change. >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> David Jencks wrote: >> >>> Um, -1. I thought this was a great idea for 2.2. What's the problem >>> that leads you to revert it? >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> On Nov 13, 2008, at 12:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> Author: gdamour >>>> Date: Thu Nov 13 00:35:05 2008 >>>> New Revision: 713680 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=713680&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> Revert addition of private-classes element. Private classes can be >>>> configured via scripts. >>>> >>>> (GERONIMO-4403) Provide a mechanism to hide specific classes of a >>>> configuration to all its children >>>> <snip> >>>> >>> >> > -- ~Jason Warner
