Those classes that Geronimo is looking for are OpenEJB classes. Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote: > The problem is with the version of ASM that is brought in when using a > higher version of XBeans. > > OpenEJB is using a method that has been removed: > org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept > > And Geronimo (already - not counting XBeans 3.5) is using classes that > have been removed: > LinkResolver > UniqueDefaultLinkResolver > > Jay > > Joe Bohn wrote: >> Thanks for the info Jay and for doing some more digging. >> >> I don't really have a strong desire to push everything to xBean 3.5. I >> was just trying to eliminate the use of multiple xBean versions as this >> could potentially cause problems (and confusion) for our users. >> >> It looks like we originally moved up to xBean 3.5 (actually >> 3.5-SNAPSHOT) to resolve a jca context issue (Geronimo-4375). However, >> it looks like it was soon discovered that there were issues with the >> OpenEJB, ASM and xBean versions in G. As a result ... we ended up >> reverting back to an older ASM and xBean 3.3 for finder and reflect >> while keeping the newer xbean-naming 3.5 so that the original issue was >> still resolved. That seems to be working and is perhaps the best >> approach. I was just concerned about using the various xBean versions >> in our Geronimo 2.1.4 server. Perhaps using the various xBean versions >> is still the best thing to do here. I didn't realize that there were >> core issues in OpenEJB attempting to use anything greater than 3.4.1. >> >> Thanks, >> Joe >> >> >> Jay D. McHugh wrote: >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> If we want to get OpenEJB 3.0.1 to move up to XBeans 3.5, then I think >>> that we'll need to chip in to resolve the problems that pop up when you >>> use a version greater than 3.4.1. >>> >>> That was the highest version (available at the time) that could be used >>> in the OpenEJB 3.0 branch without causing errors. >>> >>> I'll try switching to XBeans 3.5 (after the build I am in the middle of >>> finishes) and let you all know if it goes through cleanly. >>> >>> My feeling is that it won't though. >>> >>> Also, I have been trying to get a 'final' Geronimo 2.0.x release put >>> together and will need OpenEJB 3.0.1 for that (3.0 no longer builds >>> because the artifacts for XBeans changed groupIds). >>> >>> Jay >>> >>> Joe Bohn wrote: >>>> I was relaying the information second-hand ... so it's very possible I >>>> got it wrong. >>>> >>>> It looks like there is a dependency xBean in OpenEJB ... but it's 3.4.1 >>>> rather than 3.3 (as we have in the branches/2.1). So, perhaps if we can >>>> convince OpenEJB 3.0.x to xBean 3.5 we can then make the references >>>> consistent in our 2.1 branch. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> Donald Woods wrote: >>>>> I don't see any dependencies on Xbean in OpenJPA 1.0.x or 1.2.x. >>>>> Maybe you're thinking about OpenEJB? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Donald >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Joe Bohn wrote: >>>>>> I agree we should get a 2.1.4 release out ... and you certainly have >>>>>> my vote for release manager! >>>>>> >>>>>> The only thing I would add to the list is to get our xBean references >>>>>> to a consistent versions. I noticed this as I was updating >>>>>> branches/2.1 and trunk to pull in the newly released xBean 3.5. In >>>>>> branches/2.1 we have a mix of 3.3 dependencies (finder and reflect) >>>>>> and 3.5 dependencies (naming). I've been told that this was due to >>>>>> OpenJPA dependencies on 3.3. Now that we are pulling in a new >>>>>> OpenJPA release we will hopefully be able to update everything to use >>>>>> xBean 3.5. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jarek Gawor wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it's time for Geronimo 2.1.4 release. We've had a lot of >>>>>>> important fixes since 2.1.3 and we should get them out to our users. >>>>>>> And if we agree, I would also like to volunteer to be a release >>>>>>> manager for this release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looking at the current status for 2.1.4 there are still a few things >>>>>>> that we need to do before we can go ahead with the release. I updated >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.4+Release+Status >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> page with some of these items. If there are any open bugs that _need_ >>>>>>> to be fixed for 2.1.4 or if I missed anything in that list please >>>>>>> just >>>>>>> update that wiki page. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Jarek >>>>>>>
