That activemq webapp is cool, but I knew that JMS Resource portlet has some same functions with the activemq-webconsole, such as browser the queue and send messages. I wonder what is propose in the future, shall we replace it with activemq-webconsole? and if we integrate it in the admin-console, do we need to get the updates from activemq periodically. Thanks !
2009/3/2 David Jencks <[email protected]> > I finally spent a bit of time and got the activemq web console running in > geronimo against the embedded broker. This was fairly easy, I slimmed down > the amq war by using g. dependencies instead of WEB-INF/lib, and use the > inVM option. > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4560 > > In order to get this to work (although for reasons that are not entirely > clear to me) I had to change geronimo to use the platform mbean server > instead of creating one for itself. See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4559 > > I haven't found any problems with this yet. > > One potential concern is that jconsole can attach to a local vm without any > apparent security. However IIUC this is only on the local machine and with > some shared filesystem permission (???). So I'm inclined to think this in > not generally a security problem but would certainly like other opinions. > > Future work: > > 1. Right now there's no security at all. We need to include our own > web.xml with security constraints and change the plans to use the > geronimo-admin security realm. > > 2. It would be great to make this a portlet app and run it in the admin > console. I think the portlet app should be at activemq. > > How to try it out: > > cd plugins/activemq > mvn clean install -Pit > ./activemq-server/target/activemq-server-2.2-SNAPSHOT/bin/gsh > geronimo/start-server > > In your browser go to http://localhost:8080/activemq-console/ > Try sending a message and looking at it using the atom feed :-) > > thanks > david jencks > > -- Ivan
