On Mar 20, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

Hi David,

Do you have a patch that you can attach here (or better to a JIRA) so that others can see the proposed changes?

It is very late. I'm basically just waiting for the openjpa release to make it to the ibiblio mirrors so that I can create the RC.

If this is really minor and doesn't break anything then I supposed it could perhaps squeek in ... if it is ready to go later today or tomorrow.

I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4598 and attached a patch. With the patch (after I've changed the default plugin repo back to my local maven repo) I can use gshell to install console-jetty onto the framework server, which was failing before.

Since this AFAICT doesn't change the contents of the server nor how the plugins are wired together I think its safe to apply. We should probably also apply it to 2.1.... equivalent work should have happened a long time ago for 2.2/trunk when I made the geronimo dependencies follow transitive maven dependencies.

thanks
david jencks



Joe


David Jencks wrote:
I'm well aware this is last minute...
Recently a user has discovered that installing plugins into the framework server pretty much doesn't work for 2.1.3. I think this is because we're generating some geronimo-plugin.xml without dependency versions. My preliminary investigation looks like we can easily change this with 4 changed lines in a couple poms. I'm trying to figure out what if anything obvious this breaks. IMO we should also point to the actual 2.1.4 plugin repo http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.1.4/ rather than the local maven repo as the default plugin repo. If these don't break anything obvious (e.g. testsuite) what else would we need to test to get this into 2.1.4?
thanks
david jencks



Reply via email to