IMO, war file's name is more user friendly. -Rex
2009/6/16 Ivan <[email protected]> > WebApp_ID is not so friendly, not sure when it begins, this should be > improved, maybe we could use the war file's name as the default context. > > 2009/6/16 Jason Dillon <[email protected]> > >> Aren't we trying to do something a little bit more intelligent about >> picking a context for deployed wars w/o a plan.xml? >> >> >> >> >> >> Seems like all of these "default/..." wars want to mount under >> /WebApp_ID... forcing me to make a plan for them, just to set the context. >> >> Is this how it always worked? >> >> --jason >> > > > > -- > Ivan >
