hrm... weird... will try to clean some of my repo and build again.
--jason
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Ivan wrote:
It is in http://repository.apache.org/snapshots. But this site is in
the root pom file, it should not have problem in downloading this
module.
Ivan
2009/6/18 Jason Dillon <[email protected]>
My trunk build keeps puking on:
<snip>
Missing:
----------
1) org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:jasper:jar:6.0.18-SNAPSHOT
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -
DgroupId=org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat -DartifactId=jasper -
Dversion=6.0.18-SNAPSHOT -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the
file there:
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat
-DartifactId=jasper -Dversion=6.0.18-SNAPSHOT -Dpackaging=jar -
Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]
Path to dependency:
1) org.codehaus.mojo.jspc:jspc-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0-
alpha-2
2) org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:jasper:jar:6.0.18-SNAPSHOT
</snip>
Where is this dep?
--jason
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:31 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why do the assemblies in the repository have dependencies? I
realize that they are probably there to facilitate the build, but
shouldn't they all be marked as <scope>provided</scope>?
The reason I think they should be, is that when a user wants to use
the geronimo-maven-plugin with the assembly -bin in the repository,
before they can even download the assembly -bin, first mvn has to go
resolve every single dependency which is used to build that assembly
-bin.
I think this is broken, while I can resolve by adding a tone of
excludes, I think that this problem should be solved so that users
can more easily consume the assembly artifacts we publish to the
repository.
Any one know how easy/feasible with the current stuff (trunk and
2.1.x) it would be to mark all dependencies as provided?
Just thinking about it I don't see why it would cause problems.
Would you like to try it and see if the server at least builds? If
there are no obvious problems I'd be fine with this change.
thanks
david jencks
--jason
--
Ivan
