tried it. 1. svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/geronimo-dojo-0.4.3 mvn clean install success!
2. modify the plugins/dojo-legacy stuff the patch in attachment shows the modification. build successfully 3. I did not build the entire server, but just remove the old one, and install the new one. I believe only the debug-views portlets use this legacy dojo, because when I stop the dojo-legacy-tomcat plugin, only the debugviews-console-tomcat web project stopped autoly. and I also searched all the jsps underneath plugins folder in the server build tree, only show the ones from debugviews holding reference to "/dojo/0.4/dojo.js" results: Unfortunately, the debugviews portlet don't display corretly... I make some screen shot. Shall we open a jira for this so that I can upload them, which apparently shows dojo not work correctly? HTH Rex. 2009/7/15 Rex Wang <[email protected]> > I'd like to try it :-) > -Rex > > 2009/7/15 David Jencks <[email protected]> > > Jay -- many thanks for trying out the patch and committing it. >> >> I think the last artifact in our svn repo is the dojo 0.4.3. I can't find >> it released anywhere but the source code is in a handy svn repo. I cooked >> up a modification of our war-packaging for it that uses the maven scm plugin >> to check out the source so it can be packaged easily. I wonder if someone >> could try this out and see if it works? >> >> -- check out new war project and build it >> svn co >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/geronimo-dojo-0.4.3 >> cd geronimo-dojo-0.4.3 >> mvn clean install >> >> -- modify the plugins/dojo-legacy stuff so that >> geronimo-dojo-legacy is not built >> the dojo-legacy-jetty and dojo-legacy-tomcat plugins use the >> geronimo-dojo-0.4.3-1.0-SNAPSHOT war file instead of the >> geronimo-dojo-legacy war. >> >> -- build the server and see if the parts that use the legacy dojo still >> work (debug views??? I'm not sure) >> >> many thanks >> david jencks >> >> >> >> On Jul 10, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:59 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey David, >>>>> >>>>> I'm starting to take a look at it today. >>>>> >>>>> They have a 1.3.1 version out - any objections to me switching the >>>>> patch >>>>> to use it? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Not at all -- I just thought I'd start small since usually I change 18 >>>> things at once and then can't tell what change broke what feature :-) >>>> >>>> I think kevan mentioned offline he might take a look also. I think I've >>>> been running locally with this patch for a couple weeks and haven't seen >>>> any >>>> admin console problems, but that doesn't mean much one way or another. >>>> >>> >>> I built with the patch and ran testsuite on Jetty. Everything looked good >>> to me (except for a corba-testsuite test that hung). >>> >>> Jay, >>> If you can test with the latest Dojo version and things look good to you, >>> I'd say go ahead and apply the updates. >>> >>> --kevan >>> >> >
dojo-legacy.patch
Description: Binary data
