The bean/entity package names is still an open issue. What I just
checked in continues uses a common package name for both ... I just
changed the package name from "org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader" to
"org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.beans". By doing this we avoid
the package name conflict with other jars such as core.
So, there is still a conflict between the daytrader-beans and
daytrader-entities jars. As you pointed out we avoid the conflict in the
web-jdbc assembly by only including the daytrader-beans.jar.
When just working with jars this isn't an issue (and effectively changes
nothing for the javaee assemblies). However we need to resolve this if
we want to compose an assembly via bundles. What I checked in is still
incomplete but begins to make progress on this for the web-jdbc assembly.
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
Is there some bundle packaging problem that still required package name
unique bean vs. entities? Thought you were going to combine the
daytrader/beans files back into daytrader/entities and just pickup the
daytrader-beans.jar?
-Donald
[email protected] wrote:
Author: jbohn
Date: Wed Sep 9 13:57:23 2009
New Revision: 812965
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=812965&view=rev
Log:
Qualify package names for modules, reflect package name updates in
source structure, and bundlize the jars needed for the web jdbc assembly
