On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
+1 I checked source, digital signature/checksums, and build. A few
non-blocking issues:
1) KEYS -- I don't see your digital key in the KEYS file. Would also
prefer that you sign your key with an apache.org email address,
rather than yahoo. There are multiple KEYS files floating about svn
and dists/geronimo, etc. Would be best, IMO, to use SVN geronimo/
KEYS and sync dists/geronimo/KEYS with that.
I'll work on this, I may need some coaching. For instance I don't
understand where you are saying the KEYS files are.
2) NOTICE file in geronimo-jpa jar Says:
JPA 1.0
Copyright 2003-2009 The Apache Software Foundation
It should say something like "Apache Geronimo Specs: JPA 1.0"
Maybe, but all the other specs are more like this one.
3) Could I convince you to include the SVN tag in your vote email?
Letter of the law, IIUC, we're voting on the source-release files
that you've prepared. But good to validate that actually corresponds
to what's in svn...
Well, you can always look in the source archive for the root pom scm
info.... if that's not correct please vote -1 :-) Although this will
always be more reliable than my flaky memory, I'll try to remember to
do this in the future.
thanks
david jencks
And finally -- Thanks David!
--kevan
On Sep 15, 2009, at 4:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a
good idea to re-release our jpa 1 spec with an aritfactId of
geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec rather than the original 3.0 version number.
We don't really have a plan for what to do when jpa actually gets a
3.0 spec, but we don't have to deal with that for a bit.
This is the same as the previous geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec but with
updated build, license files, release profile, and of course
artifactId. As an osgi bundle it imports what it exports.
Staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-021/
site staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec/1.1.2/
[ ] +1 yes
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no
Vote open 72 hours
many thanks
david jencks
