Update NOTICE and LICENSE file looks good. Passes mvn rat:check. Was able to build it from the tag.
Go ahead and start a new vote, since the source code has changed and the tag was recreated. -Donald On 2/8/10 10:14 PM, Delos wrote: > I have removed the entries and re-created a tag. Could you help to take > a look at it again? > > Thanks! > > 在 2010年2月9日 上午6:04，Donald Woods <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>写道： > > Should the NOTICE file include W3C and OMG notices? Are those left in > there from prior releases (when we had a common Notice file for all > specs) and need to be removed and a new RC created? > > I was able to build from the tagged source and the mvn rat:check passed, > but would like to see unnecessary notice/license entries removed before > voting on this. > > > -Donald > > > On 2/3/10 9:39 PM, Delos wrote: > > Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 > Spec API. > > > > Staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/ > > > > The svn location is here: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/ > > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > > > Delos > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Delos
