OK, not sure what happened here, but the change went in r907919 and then the release plugin updated the artifact version in r907920 and created the tag in r907921 and the trunk code has the expected changes, but the tag doesn't?!?!?!
I'll spin a RC3 tonight to fix the tag..... URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=907919&view=rev Log: upgrade to stagged geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0-beta Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/pom.xml?rev=907919&r1=907918&r2=907919&view=diff ============================================================================== --- geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/pom.xml Tue Feb 9 03:52:58 2010 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> <artifactId>geronimo-el_2.2_spec</artifactId> - <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> + <version>1.0-beta</version> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency> <dependency> -Donald On 2/9/10 5:15 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > >> To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to >> release candidate 2 of a Beta of the Java Contexts and Dependency >> Injection (JCDI) JSR-299 Spec API. >> >> Note: This release depends upon 3 other votes in progress: >> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0-beta > > Are you sure? When I try to build the source bundle I get... > > > [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. > > Missing: > ---------- > 1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-el_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.2 > > > thanks > david jencks > >> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0-beta >> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0.0-beta >> >> >> Staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/ >> >> Source tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta >> >> >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> Thanks, >> Donald >> >> > >
