On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Jack Cai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Or just add them directly under samples? As you can see that some Java >>> EE 6 samples are based on existing ones(such as calculator). I personally >>> prefer the former, since it gives user a clear view about where to look for >>> Java EE 6 samples. >>> >>> >>> Donald's list/grouping seems reasonable. Although I'm not sure that we >>> have to provide redundant EE5 samples to demonstrate compatibility... >>> >> >> Yes, agreed. >> >> > Maybe we just simply state in a readme file that all Java EE 5 samples also > work with G 3.0, instead of duplicating them? > OK, we shall try to avoid duplication. But for simplicity and comparation reason, some duplications are intended to show the diff between ee 5 and 6. > -Jack > > Forrest
