Have the specs jars been tested in both a non osgi environment and an osgi environment ? Also, i'd like to have the scripting api and rest api osgi-fied the same way. We'd need them in servicemix, and given you have rewritten the specs to support osgi, i don't see the need to maintain the servicemix ones anymore. Also, I think there is an unresolved JIRA issue (GERONIMO-3960) about the imported packages (they should not import their own packages).
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 19:30, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: > If we wish to release a milestone soon, we need to start getting the > different subcomponents released fairly quickly. Here are the things I > believe we need to have release votes on: > > 1) New spec components. These need to be done first, and should probably > done as a single vote rather than trying to schedule a vote for each of the > jars. > 2) New javamail jar (should probably done concurrently with the javamail > spec). > 3) New xmlbeans schema jar releases (java ee 1.4, java ee 5, and java ee 6 > versions) > 4) New components jars > 5) New yoko jars > 6) New tomcat ext jars > > For 1), I think these are ready to go. I believe the issue of the package > exports has been resolved as far as it can be for the 3.1 M1 release. The > jpa and servlet specs will be exporting dual version levels because the need > to line up with different implementations that are not conforming to the > OSGi specs yet. This seems like a workable solution, at least for the short > term. I believe all of our specs are currently passing the signature tests, > so they look clean there. If I don't hear any objections, I'll start > staging these for release tomorrow morning. > > The one spec there might be a concern about is the ccpp spec jar. This is > used in the pluto support currently, but we don't currently have a TCK to > validate this one. I need some opinions on how to proceed with that jar. > For now, I'll not be submitting this one for a vote with the rest of the > specs. > > What state are the rest of these in? I suspect yoko is not stable enough > currently since David Jencks is currently working on getting the Corba > support working. We might want to delay the tomcat external release as long > as we can in case we require some patches. "As long as we can" is probably > not more than a week. The xmlbeans schema jars are probably pretty stable > and capable of being released now. > > Are the components in any shape that release votes can be started? Here > are the components we need to release: > > - geronimo-connector > - geronmo-transaction > - geronimo-jaspi > > This will need to be handled fairly soon too. > > Rick > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
