OK, as long as the old tag is removed, I'm good. -Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> A little confused here.... >> >> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant >> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2. >> >> Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released >> the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release - >> 2.0_spec-1.0.1 >> 2.0_spec-1.2 >> But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like >> you created the 1.0.1 tag - >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1 >> line >> [maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn? >> > Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback. I'll delete that. > > >> Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the >> next version? >> > This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the > interactions with the release plugin. I'd really prefer to not have to > roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue. I hope > this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues > from the previous vote. > > Rick > >> >> -Donald >> >> >> On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> >>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to >>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a >>> single vote >>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have >>> been updated >>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins >>> have been run against >>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. >>> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> >>> Staging repo: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/ >>> >>> >>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/ >>> >>> and have the same final element as the artifact name. >>> >>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list >>> server rejected my >>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the >>> email. I apologize for the incovenience. >>> >>> The following specs are being voted on >>> >>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1 >>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1 >>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 >>> >>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases. >>> >>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8 >>> >>> Source location: >>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8 >>> >>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1 >>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1 >>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2 >>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0 >>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1 >>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0 >>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1 >>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3 >>> >>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not >>> been verified via TCK yet) >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
