On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> >> >>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> >>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing >>>>>> information properly. Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have >>>>>> svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define >>>>>> the file type in our recommended client configuration -- >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. >>>>>> We might want to consider updating... >>>>>> >>>>>> A few questions: >>>>>> >>>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- >>>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/ >>>> >>>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate >>>> our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include >>>> instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use >>>> the same wording... >>>> >>>> >>> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete >>> directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been >>> closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will >>> rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for just >>> jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for >>> jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the entire >>> vote. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains >>>>>> both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in >>>>>> the jar? >>>>>> >> I'm ok with the rollback of jaxb-impl -- as long as it's clear what people >> are/have voted for. >> >> JSTL has a CDDL license, also. Is it CDDL-only or dual licensed, also? >> > Rats, that's a dual license also. I'll remove that one from the vote also > and restage separately.
Thanks Rick. So, with the exclusions of jaxb and jstl, I'm +1 for the remaining bundles. --kevan
