On May 13, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > I'm getting the openejb snapshot that David Blevins created for the M1 > release ready for a release vote, and I was wondering what version number > should be used for these jars. These will be released under the > org.apache.geronimo.openejb groupid and currently is building with a version > number of 3.1.3-r942249. I'm wondering if this should be the > org.apache.geronimo.ext.openejb groupid to be consistent with how we're > handling the tomcat external release. The Tomcat external release used a > version number of 7.0.0.0, with the last digit reflecting the Geronimo > version number. Should we follow this convention for the openejb release, or > stick with the release number than includes the origin revision number?
I think the groupId should follow what we did for tomcat. I think that since this is not a release of a particular openejb svn revision (e.g. we changed the groupId), we should not include an openejb svn revision number in the version, i.e. we should use something like 3.1.3.0 I can be talked out of either of these opinions :-) thanks david jencks > > Rick
