Btw, I was referring to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2197. I thought parts of the patch were applied to Felix but I guess I was wrong.
Jarek On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, I would think #3 is a good option, but I don't think Felix has > anything to support that (but I may be wrong). > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:41, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was looking into getting the runtime JPA entity enhancement for OSGi >> applications working in Geronimo. With some modifications to the Aries >> JPA code and some to Geronimo I was able to get runtime enhancement >> working (using the java agent approach) but with one major issue: The >> bundle that contains the persistence unit must be able to load some >> persistence provider specific (in our case openjpa) classes. That's >> because during the bytecode weaving, openjpa adds some openjpa >> specific interfaces to the entity classes. So how should we deal with >> this issue in Geronimo? >> >> 1) We could do nothing and just say we don't support runtime enhancement. >> >> 2) We could support runtime enhancement and require that bundles with >> PU have DynamicImport-Package: * header. >> >> 3) Use framework "classloader hooks" to dynamically add imports for >> the persistence provider specific packages to the bundles with PU . >> That of course, would rely on framework specific extensions. I know >> Equinox has such hooks and I think recently something similar was >> added to Felix. >> >> 4) Provide some url handler, e.g. "jpa" which would enhance the entity >> classes and add right imports during the install. Something similar to >> the "webbundle" url handler for web application archives. Of course, >> we would have to make sure the bundles with PU get installed via the >> url handler. >> >> 5) Have some kind of an extender that would generate a fragment bundle >> (with right persistence provider imports) and attach it to the bundle >> with PU. Or something similar that would require manifest modification >> or generation of additional bundle. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Jarek >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
