I checked the Tomcat's own NOTICE files, we do not distribute those components in the customized Tomcat release.
Quoted from NOTICE file : The Windows Installer is built with the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (NSIS), which is open source software. The original software and related information is available at http://nsis.sourceforge.net. Java compilation software for JSP pages is provided by Eclipse, which is open source software. The original software and related information is available at http://www.eclipse.org. For the bayeux implementation The org.apache.cometd.bayeux API is derivative work originating at the Dojo Foundation * Copyright 2007-2008 Guy Molinari * Copyright 2007-2008 Filip Hanik * Copyright 2007 Dojo Foundation * Copyright 2007 Mort Bay Consulting Pty. Ltd. The original XML Schemas for Java EE Deployment Descriptors: - javaee_5.xsd - javaee_web_services_1_2.xsd - javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd - javaee_6.xsd - javaee_web_services_1_3.xsd - javaee_web_services_client_1_3.xsd - web-app_3_0.xsd - web-common_3_0.xsd - web-fragment_3_0.xsd - jsp_2_2.xsd may be obtained from http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ In the LICENSE file, I found other licenses except for ASL in the following : 1. Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 2. zlib/libpng license. 3. bzip2 license. 4. Common Public License version 1.0. 5. COMMON DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION LICENSE (CDDL) Version 1.0 All those licenses are for Tomcat sub components. I am not quite familiar those license issues, but since we do not distribute those components, we should not require to add them. Comments ? 2010/6/2 Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > How were the LICENSE and NOTICE files built? They seem to be generic... > However, the original Tomcat license/notice files have multiple licenses and > notice information... > > --kevan > > On May 24, 2010, at 2:21 AM, Ivan wrote: > > Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.1 > a. Recently, Tomcat community has begun their vote for Tomcat 7 RC 3, so > current version should be a more stable one. > b. About the license issues found in the vote for Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.0.0, > as those files have been donated, so they are properly under ASL 2.0. At > this time, no files are removed explictly. > c. If the vote could be passed on time, I would like use this version in M1 > branch. > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > Staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/ > > > Source repo: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/tags/tomcat-parent-7.0.0.1/ > > -- > > I have run the servlet/JSP TCK, at least, the failed cases should not > caused by Tomcat codes itself. > > The codes until rev 947397 are merged from Tomcat 7.0 trunk. > > -- > Ivan > > > -- Ivan
