+1 Source, license/notice, signatures/checksums, build -- all look good.
Thanks Rick! --kevan On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. > > The tag has been created here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6/ > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.5/> > > The staging repo is here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/ > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/> > > The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz > > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.5/geronimo-2.1.5-source-release.tar.gz> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip > > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.5/geronimo-2.1.5-source-release.zip> > > The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository > for your convenience: > > http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/ > > We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for > longer than the 72-hour minimum. > > [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door > [ ] 0 no opinion > [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) > > Rick
