I have created a jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5688for this. Also, another jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5685 is also related to openwebbeans integration, and a patch is attached. David, when avaible, help to review the patch, thanks.
2010/11/13 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > I'd say we should not enable OWB support if non of these beans.xml files > are present > > /WEB-INF/beans.xml of one web app > /WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml > /WEB-INF/lib/*.jar containing a META-INF/beans.xml > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- On Fri, 11/12/10, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: OWB is always enabled even no web beans in the web > application > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Friday, November 12, 2010, 9:24 AM > > Most of current BV tck failures are > > also regressions of this. Some BV > > tck war can't be deployed when OWB is scaning it's > > classes. > > > > > > The service > > > J2EEApplication=null,j2eeType=WebModule,name=default/org.hibernate.jsr303.tck.tests.xmlconfiguration.XmlConfigurationTest/1289 > > 552829745/war did not start because > > java.lang.ArrayStoreException: > > sun.reflect.annotation.TypeNotPresentExceptionProxy > > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ArrayStoreException: > > sun.reflect.annotation.TypeNotPresentExceptionProxy > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.portable.AnnotatedElementFactory.newAnnotatedType(AnnotatedElementFactory.java:141) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deployFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:472) > > at > > org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:170) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:124) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:78) > > at > > > org.apache.geronimo.openwebbeans.OpenWebBeansWebInitializer.<init>(OpenWebBeansWebInitializer.java:55) > > at > > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.GeronimoStandardContext.setContextProperties(GeronimoStandardContext.java:233) > > at > > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.TomcatContainer.addContext(TomcatContainer.java:317) > > at > > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.TomcatWebAppContext.doStart(TomcatWebAppContext.java:566) > > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:06 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > There's definitely a bug.... possibly several. > > > > > > I'd like to know exactly what isn't getting > > initialized that causes this error. On the other hand if > > there's no beans.xml we really shouldn't be installing any > > webbeans functionality. On the third hand :-) we don't > > really know how much of an ee application is supposed to be > > "covered" by a single owb context so I'm unsure of some > > details about how to decide when to install owb stuff. I'm > > hoping to catch pete muir to ask him about this... > > > > > > thanks > > > david jencks > > > > > > On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Ivan wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> I found some jsf and ejb cases failed with > > the exception below, and apparently, no web beans is used in > > those application, suppose that all the OWB related codes > > should not be executed. After checking the integration > > codes, I found something like in the > > OpenWebBeansWebInitializer : > > >> ---> > > >> > > > servletContext.setAttribute(OpenWebBeansConfiguration.PROPERTY_OWB_APPLICATION, > > "true"); > > >> <--- > > >> Seems that OWB uses this to identify whether > > the current application is an OWB application. But the set > > action is always executed even no web bean exists in the > > application. So is there a bug here ? > > >> thanks. > > >> > > >> 2010-11-11 14:35:46,515 ERROR > > [ErrorPageWriter] An exception occurred > > >> javax.faces.FacesException: > > javax.enterprise.context.ContextNotActiveException: WebBeans > > context with scope type annotation @RequestScoped does not > > exist within current thread > > >> at > > > org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.context.ExceptionHandlerImpl.wrap(ExceptionHandlerImpl.java:241) > > >> at > > > org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.context.ExceptionHandlerImpl.handle(ExceptionHandlerImpl.java:156) > > >> at > > > org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:191) > > >> at > > > org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:118) > > >> at > > javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:189) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:304) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:240) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175) > > >> at > > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.GeronimoStandardContext$SystemMethodValve.invoke(GeronimoStandardContext.java:725) > > >> at > > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.valve.GeronimoBeforeAfterValve.invoke(GeronimoBeforeAfterValve.java:47) > > >> at > > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.valve.ProtectedTargetValve.invoke(ProtectedTargetValve.java:53) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:164) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:108) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118) > > >> at > > > org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:379) > > >> at > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:242) > > >> at > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:259) > > >> at > > > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:281) > > >> at > > org.apache.geronimo.pool.ThreadPool$1.run(ThreadPool.java:243) > > >> at > > > org.apache.geronimo.pool.ThreadPool$ContextClassLoaderRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:373) > > >> at > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:898) > > >> at > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:920) > > >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:736) > > >> Caused by: > > javax.enterprise.context.ContextNotActiveException: WebBeans > > context with scope type annotation @RequestScoped does not > > exist within current thread > > >> at > > > org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.getContext(BeanManagerImpl.java:309) > > >> at > > > org.apache.webbeans.intercept.NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.getContextualInstance(NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.java:124) > > >> at > > > org.apache.webbeans.intercept.NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.invoke(NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.java:95) > > >> at > > > org.apache.webbeans.conversation.ConversationImpl_$$_javassist_3.isTransient(ConversationImpl_$$_javassist_3.java) > > >> at > > > org.apache.webbeans.jsf.WebBeansPhaseListener.beforePhase(WebBeansPhaseListener.java:93) > > >> at > > > org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.PhaseListenerManager.informPhaseListenersBefore(PhaseListenerManager.java:76) > > >> at > > > org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:159) > > >> ... 21 more > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Ivan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Shawn > > > > > > -- Ivan
