Here's my -1. Please run RAT on the source. There are multiple source files 
missing source license headers. For example:

framework/modules/geronimo-security/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/security/realm/providers/GenericHttpHeaderLdapLoginModule.java

I can help with this, if needed. 

Signature/checksum looked good. I have not, yet, run a build. I also haven't 
run any tests (but assume others have checked this, already).

--kevan

On Nov 20, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Rex Wang wrote:

> Hi Devs,
> 
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.7 has been created and staged. 
> 
> The tag has been created here:
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.7/
> 
> The staging repo is here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/
> 
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-source-release.zip
>  
> 
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for 
> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
> 
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> 
> -- 
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org

Reply via email to