Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4 binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never passed.
$ cd /tmp $ wget -q http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz $ jar tvf /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail 562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class 7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd 6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd 2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd 32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties 0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/ 0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/ 0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/ 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml 115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties $ wget -q -U Maven http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail 562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class 7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd 6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd 2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd 32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties 0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/ 0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/ 0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/ 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml 115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394 We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind. Whether or not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to have. -David
