Could you ping the tck list with the packages or names of some of these tests 
that fail like this?

thanks
david jencks

On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I see some tck cases related to EJB 2.1 compatibility are failed with this 
> exception:
> 
> 02-16-2011 23:49:41:  ERROR: javax.naming.NotContextException: 
> comp/env/ejb/TestBean
>     at 
> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:165)
>     at 
> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:605)
>     at 
> org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.JndiRequestHandler.doLookup(JndiRequestHandler.java:188)
>     at 
> org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.JndiRequestHandler.processRequest(JndiRequestHandler.java:129)
>     at 
> org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbDaemon.processJndiRequest(EjbDaemon.java:200)
>     at org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbDaemon.service(EjbDaemon.java:153)
>     at org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbServer.service(EjbServer.java:71)
>     at 
> org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.KeepAliveServer$Session.service(KeepAliveServer.java:213)
>     at 
> org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.KeepAliveServer.service(KeepAliveServer.java:233)
>     at org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbServer.service(EjbServer.java:66)
>     at org.apache.openejb.server.ServicePool$2.run(ServicePool.java:91)
>     at org.apache.openejb.server.ServicePool$3.run(ServicePool.java:120)
>     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> 
> The exception sounds to me that the EJB 2.1 style object is not correctly 
> initialized in geronimo ejb container. 
> 
> However, from the server.log, I can see the EJB test app are successfully 
> deployed and seems the EJBs are initialized susscessfully. 
> 
> Any EJB expert can help look into this issue? Lots of traditional ejb cases 
> are failed with the same exception.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Forrest

Reply via email to