Forrest and everyone, This last source drop should be good to run the tck against.
Aries as of rev 1132725 should be fine. Tim expects to be reverting one of the fixes and reimplementing it in a better way, so if you build aries be sure the svn revision is 1132725 or after tim's new fix. There were also changes in openejb, and owb to pick up. thanks! david jencks On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Locally I've got to the same jcdi failures as trunk (after changes in aries, > OWB, and openejb). I just pushed a new source zip. DId this last tck run > complete? Do we need to do another one before committing the osgi changes? > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > >> I ever encounter build problem on aries trunk, and now they are fixed, the >> aries trunk artifacts now in my local repo. Just trigger a new server build, >> and let's wait to see :) >> >> Forrest >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:07 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: >> The last two source uploads should only be using aries trunk. The aries >> branches/0.3-RCx builds jars with the same version as trunk but they >> definitely won't work. >> >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Jun 2, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> >>> Are you refresh the code from https://people.apache.org/~djencks/? >>> >>> Here is the list that I built for dependencies: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/util/ >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/blueprint/ >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/application/ >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/ >>> >>> I there are mixed version for aries dependencies, some are in branches, >>> some are in trunk. Maybe geronimo side has something left need to update, I >>> don't know. >>> >>> Forrest >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > Hi Forrest, >>> > >>> > I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) >>> > I just committed an update to OWB that makes it more compatible with >>> > aries proxying/weaving so you may want to build owb also. >>> > OWB is in the build chain already :) >>> > >>> > >>> > I'll probably be around on and off tonight so if you run into problems >>> > soon I might be able to fix them tonight. >>> > Triggering an execution just now, so far no problem. thanks! >>> > Hi David J, >>> > >>> > After compiling the snapshot dependencies of aries, I still get >>> > compilation error at plugins/aries/geronimo-aries and >>> > geronimo-aries-builder. >>> > >>> > [INFO] Compilation failure >>> > >>> > >>> > /home/tcker/tckdata/tckbuildsrc/djg30/plugins/aries/geronimo-aries/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/aries/GeronimoApplication.java:[52,46] >>> > [deprecation] createDeploymentMetadata(java.io.InputStream) in >>> > org.apache.aries.application.DeploymentMetadataFactory has been deprecated >>> > >>> > >>> > /home/tcker/tckdata/tckbuildsrc/djg30/plugins/aries/geronimo-aries/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/aries/GeronimoApplication.java:[63,31] >>> > cannot find symbol >>> > symbol : constructor >>> > SimpleBundleInfo(org.apache.aries.util.manifest.BundleManifest,java.lang.String) >>> > location: class >>> > org.apache.aries.application.utils.management.SimpleBundleInfo >>> > >>> > I tried to fix them, but confused around variant aries util/utils classes. >>> >>> Everything builds fine for me. Are you certain you're building the current >>> version of Aries trunk? Sure looks like SimpleBundleInfo contains the >>> constructor that the compiler is complaining about... >>> >>> --kevan >>> >> >> >
