Thanks, Kevan, Just committed the patch to turnk@1138711
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > > We rebuild dojo locally to only include the dojo components geronimo > console needs. It's a popular method to use dojo. It will reduce server > size, startup time,and page loading time. I don't know if we have any > problem to apply the patch[1] from legal's perspective. > > > > I think we can't host these customized dojo source code, but we could > use the way we did to dojo legacy[2]. to put customized dojo binary to local > repository. And then include it to portal-driver or console-core at build > time. > > > > Thoughts ? > > It should be ok, IMO. In general, it would be ideal if the customization > process could be automated as part of our build. However, if that's not > practical, then we can include the customized version in our svn. > > Dojo is dual licensed: BSD and Academic Free License 2.1. > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a describes the > licenses which the ASF feels are similar to the Apache License 2.0. BSD and > AFL 3.0 are included in this list. Looking at AFL 2.1, I don't see anything > that would be objectionable. We can verify this on legal discuss. If there > is a problem with AFL 2.1, we can simply choose the BSD license. > > --kevan -- Shawn
