Oh okay, so then the Declarative Services will just be used to configure ActiveMQ? Or have you decided this is not the best route all together?
-RG On 06/28/2011 10:50 AM, David Jencks wrote: > I am definitely not replacing blueprint with spring DS. I spent a lot of > time going the other way. > > I think the problem with the placeholder config file is that we aren't > running enough of the felix or karaf deployers. There's one that reads these > config files and stuffs the data into config admin. I didn't realize how > this was supposed to work when I came up with the xbean-blueprint stuff. > There are several karaf features that we need in geronimo (mostly "features") > and I hope to have enough time to get them in soon. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jun 28, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote: > >> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987). >> >> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the >> PortOffset >> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to >> verify >> it is still broken. >> >> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which >> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the >> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed. >> >> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around to >> a >> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not >> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be >> able to >> use the config-substitution file once again. >> >> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter. >> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0, >> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki >> >> -RG >> <[CONF] Apache Geronimo v3_0 > Changing the default port numbers.eml> >
