Looks good. Thanks Shawn! Here's my +1.

license/checksum, rat, source, license/notice, builds -- all looked good to me.

--kevan
On Jul 20, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

> These are bug fix releases to fix problems in the el spec ,jaxws spec, and 
> osgi-support.
> 
>    geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0.2
>    geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.1
>    geronimo-osgi-support-1.1
> 
>   This is a single vote for 3 spec updates.  The components up for vote are:
>    
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-el_2.2_spec/1.0.2/geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0.2-source-release.tar.gz
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-el_2.2_spec/1.0.2/geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0.2-source-release.zip
>    
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip
>     
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-osgi-support/1.1/geronimo-osgi-support-1.1-source-release.tar.gz
>   
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-osgi-support/1.1/geronimo-osgi-support-1.1-source-release.zip
>   
> 
> 
>    The staging repository is:
> 
>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/
> 
> 
>    The source repos are:
> 
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0.2/
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.1/
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-osgi-support-1.1/
> 
> 
>     Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
>     [ ] +1  approve
>     [ ] +0  no opinion
>     [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> -- 
> Shawn

Reply via email to